Descartes says that Q; however, the following thought-experiment will show that Q is not true Descartes says that Q. I find this claim plausible, for the following reasons
Provides vague definition of critical thinking in less than words.
Provides a definition of critical thinking in words. Definition of critical thinking is clear and includes personal interpretation of critical thinking. Definition is clear and succinct and includes a strong, personal interpretation of critical thinking.
Uses less than three sources. No sources found through research. Provides examples that do not contribute to the definition. No quote provided, or uses a quote that exceeded 40 words in length. Uses three sources; only one source found through research library.
Provides support for original definition of critical thinking in the form of a quote from one of the three selected sources. Quote is not more than 40 words in length. Uses three sources; two sources found through research library. Uses examples from resources that are connected to the definition, but not all are relevant.
Quote is not more than 40 words in length, Quote is not clearly relevant.
Uses three sources; two sources found through research Library. Each source is supported with an in-text citation. Provides support for original definition of critical thinking in the form of one quote from one of the three selected sources.
The one quote is not more than 40 words in length, Quote brings clarity to definition. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader.
Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Avoided writing in the first and second person.
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Appropriate template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
All format elements are correct. Reference page is present, APA style is not used.A Sample Philosophy Paper annotated This contains all the required information. If your prof likes to grade anonymously, make sure not to include your name. An introduction: Again, nothing fancy.
Tell the reader what the paper is about. Provide a roadmap. And..a statement of your thesis. Some background: This can be hard. How To Write a Philosophy Essay A Guide for IPO Contestants Many guides exist on how to write a good philosophy paper.
This guide is tailored to suit contestants competing in . How to Write Philosophy Essays Offical Guide of the Philosophy Department Minnesota State University Moorhead Parenthetical Citation Format Appendix 2: Footnote and Endnote Format When you have an idea for your essay, discuss it with others, preferably with those who are not in the class.
Describe and explain to them your idea and see. Writing a Philosophy of Teaching Statement Description · Purpose · Formatting · Return to writing a philosophy statement · Major Components · Guidance · Links · References What is a Philosophy of Teaching Statement?
Structuring a Philosophy Paper Philosophy assignments generally ask you to consider some thesis or argument, often a thesis or argument that has been presented by another philosopher (a thesis is argument, you may be asked to do one or more of the following: explain it, offer an argument in support of.
You may also find the following sample paper illustrating some of the above points helpful. The above suggestions are a good place to start, but aren't exhaustive. Two excellent paper-writing guides that are more extensive than this one are Guidelines on Writing a Philosophy Paper, by James Pryor, and How to Write a Philosophy Paper, by Peter Horban.